Saturday, July 31, 2010
Friday, July 30, 2010
Rattlesnakes everywhere
Layout of postage stamp
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
Monday, July 26, 2010
Bloglines - Test your knowledge of cosmetics safety: 8 myths debunked
more about cosmetics
| |||||
|
Bloglines - A personal response to the President's Cancer Panel Report
Scary stuff
| |||||
|
Saturday, July 24, 2010
sent you a link to content of interest
How to be Insanely Productive and Still Keep Smiling
http://zenhabits.net/productive-and-smiling/
The sender also included this note:
Another great column
--
Sent via a FeedFlare link from a FeedBurner feed.
http://www.google.com/support/feedburner/bin/answer.py?answer=78966&topic=13246
Its a Start!
set fruit yet. My chinese pole beans, 2 of them, are trying to grow on the right but not tall enough to tie to the trellis yet by any means.
The trellis is the wrought iron from an old security door we had found here on the property and should work very well. When I take out the logs and fill up the other side of the tank with dirt, I will just leave the trellis in place and the dirt on both sides will hold it up. Good plan.
Yesterday I transplanted some sweet basil seedlings to the center front and ensalada tomato seedling in the center middle. I have cut off clear plastic bottle/jars over them to keep the humidity up around them and protect them from the worst of the excess sun. They are doing well so far, and since I gave up on the other peat pots ever sprouting anything, I noticed this morning that seeds have sprouted in both the patio pot tomatos and the early girl. So those will be moved up to the stock tank garden in a few days.
I also ordered several different kinds of heirloom tomato seeds from Seed Savers.org to plant, so I should have lots of tomato plants by the time it cools enough for them to set fruit. Cant wait. Iwant to can and can tomatoes in jars so that I never have to use canned tomatoes with the Bisphenol-A lining again.
Monday, July 19, 2010
Bloglines - Why You Should Cancel Your Cable
Threw away the whole darn thing in 1989. Maybe a few people are finally beginning to figure out why.
| |||||
|
Sunday, July 18, 2010
Bloglines - Tips And Tricks For Food Satisfaction
Food for Thought, haha
| |||||
|
sent you a link to content of interest
The elements of change
http://zenhabits.net/elements-of-change/
The sender also included this note:
ANother good post by Leo B
--
Sent via a FeedFlare link from a FeedBurner feed.
http://www.google.com/support/feedburner/bin/answer.py?answer=78966&topic=13246
Monday, July 12, 2010
Food for Thought from Salon.com
The Democratic Party may lose dozens of seats in November, but every demographic trend still favors the left.
By Joe Conason
iStockphoto/Salon
The warnings for Democrats in national polling data remain bleak and unmistakable, from a demoralized progressive base to a revitalized hardcore right, with disenchanted independents veering Republican. With employment trending poorly and no second stimulus in sight, the current question is not whether the Democratic Party will be beaten in the midterm but just how badly.
Before Republicans start to dream again of Karl Rove’s hundred years of GOP domination, however, they might consult the latest working paper by political demographer Ruy Teixeira, who predicted the return of the Democrats back when things looked worst for his party during the early Bush era. According to Teixeira, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, every long-term trend in population, occupation and education still portends a Democratic America in the 21st century.
By now many Americans are aware that the United States is becoming "majority-minority" within the next few decades, a change that Teixeira predicts will occur by 2042. Between now and then, the strongly Democratic orientation of minority voters -- African-Americans, Latinos and Asian-Americans -- will continue to shape electoral results in most states. At the same time, the share of conservative white working-class voters, who tend to vote Republican, is declining:
Heavily Democratic minority voters (80 percent for Obama) increased their share of votes in U.S. presidential elections by 11 percentage points between 1988 and 2008, while the share of increasingly Democratic white college graduate voters rose 4 points. But the share of white working-class (not college-educated) voters, who have remained conservative in their orientation, has plummeted by 15 points.
By 2050, the country will be 54 percent minority as Latinos double from 15 percent to 30 percent of the population, Asian Americans increase from 5 percent to 9 percent, and African Americans move from 14 to 15 percent.
But the Republicans face severe alienation among other growing demographic cohorts as well:
The Millennial generation (those born between 1978 and 2000) is adding 4 million eligible voters to the voting pool every year, and this group voted for Obama by a stunning 66-32 margin in 2008. By 2020—the first presidential election in which all Millennials will have reached voting age—this generation will be 103 million strong, and about 90 million of them will be eligible voters. Those 90 million Millennial eligible voters will represent just under 40 percent of America’s total eligible voters…
Professionals are now the most Democratic and fastest-growing occupational group in the United States, and they are a huge chunk of the burgeoning white college graduate population. They gave Obama an estimated 68 percent of their vote in 2008. By the middle of this decade, professionals will account for around one in five American workers….
Democrats also generally do better among women than men, and they do particularly well among growing female subgroups such as the unmarried and the college educated. Seventy percent of unmarried women voted for Obama, and an estimated 65 percent of college-educated women supported him. Unmarried women are now 47 percent, or almost half, of adult women, up from 38 percent in 1970, and college-educated women are an especially rapidly growing population. Their numbers have more than have tripled in recent decades, from just eight percent of the 25-and-older female population in 1970 to 28 percent today.
Finally, growing religious diversity favors Democrats as well, especially rapid increases among the unaffiliated (75 percent of whom voted for Obama). Unaffiliated or secular voters—not white evangelical Protestants—are the fastest-growing “religious” group in the United States… Looking even farther down
the road, white Christians will be only around 35 percent of the population by 2040, and conservative white Christians, who have been such a critical part of the Republican base, will be only about a third of that—a minority within a minority.
Although he is certainly a Democratic partisan, Teixeira says the party could easily forfeit all of its advantages:
[The Democrats’] chief challenge now is governance, which is daunting in its own right. They have an ambitious agenda in areas such as health care, financial reform, education, energy, and global relations that they are having some success in pursuing. If these policies have their intended effects and make serious progress toward remedying problems in these areas, Democrats will be in very good shape indeed and will solidify their support among emerging demographics while destabilizing what is left of the GOP coalition.
Conversely, if the Democrats fail to produce—whether through ineffective programs, fiscal meltdown, or both—even an unreformed GOP will remain very competitive despite the many demographic changes that are disadvantaging the party. The next few years will tell the tale.
Governing, of course, will become even more difficult with smaller majorities in the House and the Senate, a prospect that requires a toughness yet to be displayed in the Obama White House or on Capitol Hill.
Illegal aliens really do cost much more than they contribute
Illegal Immigration a $113 Billion a Year Drain on U.S. Taxpayers
FAIR Releases First-of-its-Kind Comprehensive Study of Federal, State and Local Costs of Illegal Immigration
(Washington, D.C July 6, 2010) A new study released today by the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) estimates that illegal immigration now costs federal and local taxpayers $113 billion a year. The report, The Fiscal Burden of Illegal Immigration on U.S. Taxpayers, is the most comprehensive analysis of how much the estimated 13 million illegal aliens and their U.S.-born children cost federal, state and local governments.
The cost estimates are based on an extensive analysis of federal, state and local spending data. The Fiscal Burden of Illegal Immigration on U.S. Taxpayers examines dozens of government programs that are available to illegal aliens and their U.S.-born children, both legally and fraudulently. The report provides detailed analysis of the impact of illegal immigration on education, health care, law enforcement and justice, public assistance, and other government programs.
The report also accounts for taxes paid by illegal aliens about $13 billion a year, resulting in a net cost to taxpayers of about $100 billion. However, the study notes that government at all levels would likely have realized significantly greater revenues if jobs held by illegal aliens had been filled by legal U.S. residents instead.
Federal spending on illegal aliens amounts to $29 billion, finds Fiscal Burden of Illegal Immigration on U.S. Taxpayers. The lion’s share of the costs of illegal immigration is borne by state and local taxpayers an estimated $84.2 billion. In 18 states, expenditures on illegal aliens exceeded the size of those states’ budget deficits in FY 2009.
Among the key findings of The Fiscal Burden of Illegal Immigration on U.S. Taxpayers:
The $113 billion in outlays for services and benefits to illegal aliens and their families represents an average cost to native-headed households of $1,117 a year. Because the burdens of illegal immigration are not evenly distributed, the costs are much higher in states with large illegal alien populations.
Education for the children of illegal aliens represents the single largest public expenditure at an annual cost of $52 billion. Nearly all of that cost is absorbed by state and local governments.
The federal government recoups about one-third of its share of the costs of illegal immigration in the form of taxes collected. States, which bear a much greater share of the costs, recoup a mere 5 percent of their expenditures from taxes paid by illegal aliens.
Granting amnesty to illegal aliens, as President Obama and others propose, would not significantly increase tax revenues generated by current illegal aliens. However, over time, amnesty would dramatically increase public costs as newly-legalized aliens become eligible for all means-tested government programs.
Arizona’s annual cost of illegal immigration is $2.5 billion.
“The Fiscal Burden of Illegal Immigration on U.S. Taxpayers provides a definitive response to the question of whether illegal aliens are a net benefit or a net drain on government coffers,” stated Dan Stein president of FAIR. “The report examines virtually every federal, state and local government program to determine the impact of illegal immigration on the bottom line. That bottom line $113 billion a year, and growing makes our nation’s failure to control illegal immigration one of the largest preventable burdens borne by American taxpayers.”
“If political leaders in Washington and state capitals want to understand why the American public is demanding enforcement of our immigration laws, The Fiscal Burden of Illegal Immigration on U.S. Taxpayers, provides 113 billion good reasons,” Stein concluded.
Read the report.
sent you a link to content of interest
Taking responsibility for preventing further oil spills
http://noimpactman.typepad.com/blog/2010/07/taking-responsibility-for-preventing-further-oil-spills.html
The sender also included this note:
Please read this.
--
Sent via a FeedFlare link from a FeedBurner feed.
http://www.google.com/support/feedburner/bin/answer.py?answer=78966&topic=13246
sent you a link to content of interest
Personality psychology and early retirement resistance
http://earlyretirementextreme.com/persoanlity-psychology-early-retirement-resistance.html
The sender also included this note:
Better understanding always helps
--
Sent via a FeedFlare link from a FeedBurner feed.
http://www.google.com/support/feedburner/bin/answer.py?answer=78966&topic=13246
Sunday, July 11, 2010
Bloglines - 10 Simple Changes to Your Day
Words to the wise
| |||||
|
Bloglines - What Makes You Come Alive?
I want to keep these where I can reread it.
| |||||
|
New tablecloth, continued
I sewed two of those light blue blankets together and pinned them up in place of the flannel sheet. I think they will work out very well, as the surface is very felty and blocks should stick pretty well even without pins. They werent sticking to the previous sheet anymore, as it is getting old and the surface was wearing off.
Fwd: zen habits: The Clean-Slate Guide to Simplicity
From: zen habits <zenhabits@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:04 PM
Subject: zen habits: The Clean-Slate Guide to Simplicity
To:
zen habits: The Clean-Slate Guide to Simplicity |
The Clean-Slate Guide to Simplicity Posted: 09 Jul 2010 09:40 AM PDT Editor's note: This is a guest post from Jeffrey Tang of The Art of Great Things.When we think about simplifying, we usually think about subtraction. Getting rid of excess stuff. Clearing away obligations. Deleting old emails. We simplify by paring away the layers of something until we find the core. Too many books on the shelf? Give them away, one by one, until you're left with a manageable number of the volumes you really enjoy. But decluttering this way is hard. For example: Do you really want to pull dozens of books off the shelf one by one, trying to decide whether to keep or sell each one? Do you have the time to go through hundreds of backlogged emails, choosing which to save and which to delete? And there's another obstacle. When you're forced to choose to keep or discard something, uncertainty rears its ugly head. "Can you really afford to throw this away?" it whispers. "Are you sure you won't need it eventually? Sure, you're on a simplification kick now – but will you regret it later?" Playing the willpower game with uncertainty gets exhausting. Simplifying Backwards is Easier If you're having trouble deciding when to hold on to something and when to let it go, try doing things backward. Learn to add responsibly instead of subtracting. I call it the clean-slate approach to simplifying. Here's how it works, in three steps. Step one: Take all the clutter you're facing, useful or not, and put it away. All of it. Put the pile of clothes in a box; put the old emails in a hidden folder. Now you have a "clean slate" to work with, but you don't have to throw anything away. Yet. Step two: Go about your business as usual. As you discover a genuine need for something (genuine being the operative word), take it out of storage with a clear conscience. No more agonizing over what to keep. Life will show exactly which things you actually need, and which things you only thought you needed. Step three: When you're ready, sell, donate, or throw away the stuff in storage. It's easier now, since you've had weeks or months to overcome your attachment to it. And here's a bonus: if you develop the discipline to only put stuff back in your life when you absolutely, positively need it, you'll find it easier to keep from buying, collecting, or accumulating unnecessary stuff in the first place. 4 Ways to Simplify with the Clean Slate Method How can you put this method to use? Here are a few ideas: 1. Clean Out Your Email: If you're staring hopelessly at an inbox full of read and unread messages, email drafs, and spam, consider declaring email bankruptcy. If you use Gmail, the archive feature lets you easily move all the mail out of your inbox and into a separate folder. Instant inbox zero. If you use a desktop mail client like Outlook, you can export your mail data to a separate folder, then clear out your active inbox. Worried about missing obligations to friends or customers? Send an email to your important contacts explaining your email bankruptcy and asking them to remind you of anything vitally important. And now? Go about your business. If you need an old email, move it from your archive folder into another, active folder. Simple. Don't stress, don't agonize – just go with the flow. 2. Pare Down Your Library: Clear off your bookshelves and put all the books in a box. Now you have empty shelves to work with. If you discover you need a book to read or reference, pull it out of the box and put it back on the shelf. Books that you need and love will naturally come back into your life; books that were just nice to look at or think about reading will stay out of your way. This also works well with DVDs, CDs, or cassette tapes, if you have them. Eventually, you may feel ready to donate or sell that box of old books entirely. 3. Reformat Your Computer: The easiest way to do this is with a secondary hard drive or USB flash drive. Take all your files and programs and copy them to your secondary drive. Then reformat (wipe) your primary hard drive and reinstall your operating system of choice. Going forward, only allow yourself to download a file or install a program if life shows you a genuine need for it. Try to avoid overlaps: do you really need that fancy word processor – or is the simple text editor you already have enough? On the other hand, when you do find a genuine need for a new program, you can install it without feeling guilty. 4. Simplify Your Closet: Take all your clothes and put them aside. Most items can go in a box or a drawer. If you're worried about your nicer garments, just push them to one side of the bar or use a placeholder hanger to divide your "storage" section from your "useful" section. You may also want to commit to a regular laundry schedule – waiting three or four weeks to do laundry is a sure way to fall right back into a cluttered closet. After a while, you'll develop a cycle or routine of clothing that shows you exactly which clothes you actually need, and which clothes are just closet eye candy. Setting a Purge Deadline To really make the clean slate method work for you, it's helpful to set a purge deadline. This deadline is how long you allow yourself to keep all your old stuff in storage before you get rid of it for good. When you set the deadline is up to you. You might decide to eliminate anything you haven't found a need for within 60 days, or 90 days, or a month. Whatever your number is, it's a good idea to commit to it in advance, so there's no second-guessing yourself later on. The clean-slate method is just one way to simplify your life and your stuff, but it's worked very well for me. If you find it difficult to simplify the "normal" way, give it a try. You might be pleasantly surprised. Jeffrey writes about simplicity, great work, and lifestyle leadership over at The Art of Great Things. Read more by subscribing to his feed or following him on Twitter. |
You are subscribed to email updates from zen habits To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
Saturday, July 10, 2010
New tablecloth
Friday, July 09, 2010
Rattlesnake
In the meantime, I am just grateful that he is nervous enough to keep rattling when we or the dogs get near. So much better than having one lie in wait quietly, waiting for you to get close enough to strike. Perish the thought.
Thursday, July 08, 2010
View from the north
Saturday, July 03, 2010
Laurenes's Legacy
FW: Nourishing News: July 2010
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||